Recent corporate scandals and the global financial crisis have launched a renewed push for more visibility into executive pay. This month, amid public outrage in France against the country’s former budget minister, the government revealed its proposals for financial transparency among ministers and other top officials. And last month, in response to a scandal involving a Swiss pharma company, Switzerland passed what some are calling “the world’s strictest controls on executive pay.” Those rules give shareholders binding say on the overall pay packages for executives and directors and require disclosure of all loans to executives. Germany aims to follow suit, and Chancellor Merkel’s ruling coalition there has already proposed new rules giving shareholders more say as to executive pay.
The idea that companies should disclose how much they pay their top executives has a long tradition in the United States. Since its creation in 1934, the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) has overseen disclosure of how top executives at publicly traded companies are compensated. More specifically, pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, companies must reveal in each 10-K or proxy statement how much their top executives earn.
Over the course of the past 80 years, the SEC has also periodically updated its disclosure rules to encompass new forms of executive pay, including stock options, compensation packages, perks (corporate jets, club memberships, etc.) and pension benefits. Today, “[i]t is generally accepted that shareholders – and the public, for that matter – have a right to know how much the CEO and other top officers are paid, and that more disclosure is always preferred to less,” writes Kevin J. Murphy, a professor of Finance and Business Economics at USC Marshall School of Business. More…


